I know there's a crisis in California and all, but for some reason I just can't help but smile at the total failure of a government that's too big for the good of it's people.
Arnold sums the whole thing up beautifully:
"In four weeks, in the last four weeks, instead of negotiating and coming to a budget agreement, they decided to debate and to debate and to have hearings and more debates and more hearings and finger-pointing and assigning blame. At the end of the day, they haven't accomplished anything."
But man, am I glad I got my California tax refund back when I did. Though the IOU I would have gotten might have been handy, since I'm running low on toilet paper.
Thursday, July 2, 2009
Friday, June 26, 2009
Law and order
I don't know why I find this little bit of dialogue hilarious. But I do.
An officer acting in perfect accordance with Kansas law regarding domestic violence gives the suspect the low down in three little words (four if you count the contraction).
Lady being arrested: Y'all ain't gonna do nothin' to him for shoving me?
Cop doing the arresting: Ma'am, you started the fight.
Lady: No, I'm talkin' about yesterday he shoved me.
Cop: No. We're not.
It's just heartening to hear some who knows so steadfastly where his responsibility stops, and someone else's starts.
I guess it helps I love old episodes of Cops, too.
An officer acting in perfect accordance with Kansas law regarding domestic violence gives the suspect the low down in three little words (four if you count the contraction).
Lady being arrested: Y'all ain't gonna do nothin' to him for shoving me?
Cop doing the arresting: Ma'am, you started the fight.
Lady: No, I'm talkin' about yesterday he shoved me.
Cop: No. We're not.
It's just heartening to hear some who knows so steadfastly where his responsibility stops, and someone else's starts.
I guess it helps I love old episodes of Cops, too.
Thursday, March 19, 2009
Friday, November 7, 2008
Consensus
Things we know by consensus:
1. The world is flat.
2. God exists.
3. Megan should get off the island.
4. The high and low temperature in the year 2103.
5. God doesn't exist.
6. George Walker Bush is a good president. (ca. 2002)
1. The world is flat.
2. God exists.
3. Megan should get off the island.
4. The high and low temperature in the year 2103.
5. God doesn't exist.
6. George Walker Bush is a good president. (ca. 2002)
I may be... *gulp* ...liberal.
I've always know that semantics are important. I just didn't know quite how much until recently.
More often than not my degree in philosophy helps me just about as much as it hurts me. An example of this is how good I am in my use of definitions. More specifically, I am good at using common words like 'conservative' and 'liberal' in totally expected ways, but with apparently uncommon usages.
For the few years that I have actually been paying attention to politics, I had assumed that underneath all of the labeling that goes along with the terms 'conservative' and 'liberal' there was a reason for the polar differences in the attitudes of the people who labeled themselves thusly. So I investigated, and true to the form of a philosophy student I reduced these terms to what I thought was their most simple and polar concept without consulting anyone or anything of authority. I concluded that a liberal is a person who likes government the way I like cream cheese on my bagel: applied liberally. Then I assumed the opposite of conservatives: government applied conservatively.
I had no idea how wrong I was.
Being a person who uses definitions like I do, I consulted that thing which is both my bane and my savior at the same time--the dictionary. So when it told me a person who calls himself a liberal really just thinks individual rights are paramount, I flipped out. Since a smaller government would clearly have fewer opportunities to infringe on individual rights I had assumed I was conservative.
But then I checked the dictionary again, this time regarding conservatism. Turns out these people just want to keep things the way they are. So if I were to actually be a conservative by this definition, and hold my current political ideas at the same time, I would have to live sometime around the early 1800s. I guess since I only have power to make time flow in a forward direction, I am forced to accept my new label. I'm a liberal.
Though on the bright side and with a hint of irony, by the dictionary's definition, liberals aren't actually liberal. But that's a discussion for another day.
More often than not my degree in philosophy helps me just about as much as it hurts me. An example of this is how good I am in my use of definitions. More specifically, I am good at using common words like 'conservative' and 'liberal' in totally expected ways, but with apparently uncommon usages.
For the few years that I have actually been paying attention to politics, I had assumed that underneath all of the labeling that goes along with the terms 'conservative' and 'liberal' there was a reason for the polar differences in the attitudes of the people who labeled themselves thusly. So I investigated, and true to the form of a philosophy student I reduced these terms to what I thought was their most simple and polar concept without consulting anyone or anything of authority. I concluded that a liberal is a person who likes government the way I like cream cheese on my bagel: applied liberally. Then I assumed the opposite of conservatives: government applied conservatively.
I had no idea how wrong I was.
Being a person who uses definitions like I do, I consulted that thing which is both my bane and my savior at the same time--the dictionary. So when it told me a person who calls himself a liberal really just thinks individual rights are paramount, I flipped out. Since a smaller government would clearly have fewer opportunities to infringe on individual rights I had assumed I was conservative.
But then I checked the dictionary again, this time regarding conservatism. Turns out these people just want to keep things the way they are. So if I were to actually be a conservative by this definition, and hold my current political ideas at the same time, I would have to live sometime around the early 1800s. I guess since I only have power to make time flow in a forward direction, I am forced to accept my new label. I'm a liberal.
Though on the bright side and with a hint of irony, by the dictionary's definition, liberals aren't actually liberal. But that's a discussion for another day.
Thursday, October 2, 2008
ninetyfive hundredths of a person
In Obama's plan 95% of citizens in this country will receive tax breaks; that is, people whose incomes are less than $250,000. This is who Obama refers to as 'real Americans'. Those who make more than $250,000 a year do not qualify as American. Now these lucky few--the few that have managed to reach places in their careers most people in this country want for themselves--are rewarded for their hard work with fewer rights and more taxes. Hurrah.
It almost makes me wish only 60% of people in America earned less than $250k, that way I could have titled this post 'three fifths of a person'. Somehow that seems a little bit more fitting.
By the way, this is what Obama calls 'fair'.
It almost makes me wish only 60% of people in America earned less than $250k, that way I could have titled this post 'three fifths of a person'. Somehow that seems a little bit more fitting.
By the way, this is what Obama calls 'fair'.
Tuesday, September 30, 2008
Silence is Golden, and not related to the dollar
The bill in the house intended to bail out a few trillion dollars worth of bad debt with $700B did not pass today and we managed to keep a few more rights than I was expecting. Since I don't get to complain about what I thought I was going to complain about, I'm going to try out my newly fashioned occam's hammer on this grand ol' economic crisis we're having.
On second thought, it's complicated enough. The whole thing could probably use one less person thinking they know how to solve the problems of everyone else. So just like I do after I chloroform my neighbors incessantly yipping dog, I'm going to let it be.
On second thought, it's complicated enough. The whole thing could probably use one less person thinking they know how to solve the problems of everyone else. So just like I do after I chloroform my neighbors incessantly yipping dog, I'm going to let it be.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)